How Stable Are Your Apps?

February 4th, 2012

iOS or Android?  This is the first time we have seen a study on apps running on these two operating systems.  While apps running on iOS tend to be more polished it seems Android apps may actually be more stable!  “The latest version of iOS (5.0.1) leads all others with 28.64% of all crashes, Forbes reports”

What the report does not seem to consider is whether the app is tied to a specific OS version or if the latest version of the app was installed (though this was brought up in reference to iOS 5.0.1′s high abnormally high crash percentage).  This is important because many newer Apps don’t play well on older devices (lower processor speeds/RAM) and some older apps need to be updated to work as intended on new devices.  There are other variables that  also need to be considered including other installed apps that may cause conflicts and other unknown handset issues.

What we do find worthy of noting – Android has long been attacked by critics as being fragmented; providing a lower quality user experience.  The theory being that this OS fragmentation, in addition to limited updates available based on device and manufacturer, creates an environment ripe for app failure and incompatibility – that apps may work perfectly on one device/OS version but not on another.

In the end, there are a host of variables that may not have been considered, but the report is Interesting to say the least.

What’s your take?  Have you had apps crash on your Apple or Android device?

Share

Tuesday #TechTip – Rice does not fix water damaged cell phones.

January 31st, 2012

We constantly see a host of Old Wives Tales for repairing wet cell phones.  Fact of the matter – these do NOT work.

Share

Your Tuesday Tech Tip – RSS Readers

January 24th, 2012

One of the best apps for your smartphone or tablet to increase your productivity and efficiency is an RSS Reader.  Rather than spending the time to head to each site to keep up to date, your RSS Reader can collect that information and bring it to you.

For Android we recommend Google Reader and for iOS we recommend Reeder.

 

Share

Corning’s Gorilla Glass 2

January 19th, 2012

A few weeks back we posted a video discussing the strength (or lack thereof) of Corning’s Gorilla Glass.  According to Corning, Gorilla Glass features exceptional damage resistance to the scratches, drops, and bumps of everyday use.  But this is an incomplete story when applied to cell phones.

Gorilla Glass is much more durable than the traditional glass used (and we’d prefer it given the choice) but based on the number of devices on which it’s installed that we see in our shop for cracked lenses, it certainly does not live up to Corning’s hype about it with respect to cell phones.

This past week at CES Corning announced its latest development – Gorilla Glass 2.  They tout it as being 20% thinner yet just as durable.  That got us thinking.

The new glass will make for thinner and lighter smartphones (although we’re not sure how much thinner & lighter than the Motorola Droid RAZR we can get, and it uses the original Gorilla Glass).  It should also result in brighter screens and better sensitivity.  Since the touch sensitive digitizer sits below the outer lens, thinner glass will increase responsiveness.  The glass has also been engineered to allow more light.

While thinner would appear to be better, unless the glass is substantially stronger there could be see some potential issues.  Most of the devices we see come into our shop with broken screens still function properly.  This gives the customer the option of having the unit repaired or continuing to use it damaged, a very feasible choice for the customer who cannot afford the repair – many screen replacements are more than $100 – or who have only a couple of months to get by before qualifying for an upgrade.

However, devices manufactured with the thinner Gorilla Glass 2 as the outer glass will be more susceptible to more collateral damage, either to the digitizer or the LCD.  This will eliminate the owner’s ‘use-as-is or repair’ option as the damage would render the cell phone unusable in that state.  Not only will repairs be required for the phone to be functional, the thinner design will likely mean a higher repair cost.

Most of the new phones already require that the LCD and lens be replaced as a sealed factory unit (for proper repair) but some can still be replaced as individual parts.  With the thinner Gorilla Glass 2, it is far more likely that this will not be possible.  Add that to the expected higher cost of the new glass and customers could be in for a surprise.

We are all for better design and new innovation and are excited for the possibilities projected for Corning’s Gorilla Glass 2, but we are also cautious as to potential costs facing customers should this new glass break.

Time will tell.

lue Ridge Wireless

Share

Tuesday #TechTip: SIM Unlocking and Data Issues

January 17th, 2012

 

SIM cards - Blue Ridge Wireless cell phone repair  Looking to move your AT&T phone to T-Mobile?  Looking to buy an unlocked phone online to use with AT&T or T-Mobile?  Be aware that you are not likely going to get the 3G or 4G data speeds expected…

 

 

Share

‘Way back Wednesday” (#Oldtech): The ‘Original’ Tablet

January 11th, 2012

OK, so we are taking some liberties on this one.   With so many iPads and tablets currently in use many in the hands of younger children (not to mention the number that are being revealed at this year’s CES show), we couldn’t resist.  We’re pretty sure most of use either have or have had an Ohio Art Etch-a-Sketch.  They are still favorites of my children!

Share

Tuesday #TechTip: Be Aware of How Much Data You Use.

January 10th, 2012

 

With the shift away from unlimited data, you need to be aware of just how many activities performed on your smartphone require data usage.  The topic came to light after reading a report that iPhone 4s users are using more data than iPad users in many cases leading to network congestion.  The answer as to why may lie in services like iCloud and Siri (both new to the iPhone and iOS5).  Both require data access to sync your information (something running regularly even on Android devices) and to access the server needed to provide information requested.  The point – make sure you know what activities performed on your phone use data and be sure to keep track of the usage to avoid a hefty overage charge.

Share

‘Way back Wednesday” (#Oldtech): Data cards

January 4th, 2012

With all of the hype surrounding the data speeds associated with LTE we thought it was time to take a journey back to the original ‘high speed’ data / modem cards of yesteryear!  Check out the T-Mobile USA (Voicestream) Novatel NRN-G2000, Sprint’s Sierra Wireless Aircard and Verizon Wireless’ PC5740 Broadband Access card!

Talk about speed – the PC5740 was capable of delivering data speeds of up to 2.4Mbps but NationalAccess speeds were only 60-80 kbps with bursts to 144kbps!!

The Verizon and T-Mobile cards are real and do still work.

 

Share

Tuesday #TechTip: Dialing 911 in an Emergency

January 3rd, 2012

In an emergency, would your child be able to call 911 from your smartphone?  Given how the market has shifted to smartphones, many of which are customized to a point where even finding the dialer can be tough (we even have a problem when testing some phones after a repair), it’s something to consider.

Share

Verizon Wireless might be planning a $2 bill pay fee….

December 29th, 2011

We never understood the idea of charging a convenience fee to pay your bill electronically, but in a move to drive customers to auto-pay (which prevents non and late payments) Verizon Wireless may be joining Sprint and AT&T in charging customers and extra $2 to pay their bill online or by phone. (http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/29/leaked-memo-details-verizons-2-fee-for-paying-your-bill-autod/)

We’re fine with charging the fee for paying by phones since there is a hard cost for the operator and time to manually process the payment (not to mention the chargeback risk), but not everyone likes auto pay, especially since it could make it harder to dispute a billing error.

We’d prefer to see Verizon Wireless create a policy that directly targets the habitually late payer rather than tag their general customer base.  How about adding a fee for phone payments (again there is a cost associated with it) and maybe even fee for old fashioned written checks.  Leave off the fee for online bill pay until the customer misses 3 payments.  Then require the customer to pay the fee or switch to auto-pay.

Looks like we’ll be mailing them an old fashioned check!

What are your thoughts?

Share